New Jersey
Civil Justice Institute

  • Helpful Links
  • Contact Us
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Mission
    • Membership
    • Our Staff
  • ISSUES & ADVOCACY
  • OUR WORK IN THE COURTS
  • NEWSROOM
  • GET INVOLVED

Fairness. Justice.
Rule of Law.

An Appealing Policy Change

July 10, 2015News, Top StoriesAppeal Bond Cap, Business Climate, Legal Reform, New Jersey LegislatureNJCJI

Did you know New Jersey is one of only eleven states where the court system is required to give tobacco companies a benefit that other defendants are denied? It’s true. As part of the Master Settlement Agreement reached in 1998, New Jersey agreed to put a cap on the amount of money tobacco companies must post as bond in order to appeal adverse verdicts in exchange for money and other concessions from the 5 tobacco companies involved in the litigation. To this day, tobacco companies are the only defendants in New Jersey that get the benefit of an appeal bond cap.

 

Why does this matter?

When a defendant loses a case at trial and the plaintiff receives a monetary award, state law typically allows the plaintiff to collect that money as soon as the trial court proceedings conclude. In many cases, however, the defendant will appeal to a higher court seeking reversal of the trial court’s determination. Under current law In New Jersey, in order to file an appeal, the defendant must post a bond for the full amount of the award while the appeal is pending. With awards now reaching hundreds of millions of dollars, it is often financially ruinous for a defendant to post such a large bond. In these cases justice takes a back seat to economics, and companies will pay instead of appealing even what they consider to be wrongly decided.

 

What are other states doing?

Other states have realized that tobacco companies aren’t the only businesses that get hit with big verdicts, and have put caps in place for all defendants or eliminated appeal bonds altogether. The map below shows how the law varies across the country.

 

As of July 10, 2015, there are 33 states that have done away with appeal bonds or capped them for all defendants.

 

While the New Jersey legislature refuses to move legislation forward that would expand our current cap to all businesses (note how A1055/S2052 have both stalled in committee), other states continue to see the value in making sure final verdicts reflect the facts in the case rather than bond financing options.

 

Nevada is the most recent appeal bond cap adopter. The legislature there passed SB134, which limits appeal bonds to the lesser of $50 million or the amount of the judgment. Under the new law small businesses benefit from an even lower cap, just $1 million or the amount of the judgment.

 

In May, Maryland passed HB 164/SB301, which caps appeal bonds in that state at $100 million. There is an indication that the legislature will consider creating a lower cap for small businesses, potentially set at $1 million, in a future session.

 

Giving all companies the ability to appeal big verdicts against them without mortgaging their future or declaring bankruptcy is good legal policy. It is time for New Jersey to recognize that tobacco cases are not the only cases where big verdicts are possible, and adopt an appeal bond cap that applies to all defendants. If you agree, we urge you to share this article with your legislators, and tell them that you think all defendants should be given the benefit of an appeal bond cap.

 

 

Categories

    Press Releases
    Recent News
    Top Stories

Tag Cloud

Appeal Bond Cap | Arbitration | Attorney Fees | Bad Faith | Bankruptcy Trust | Business Climate | CFA | Civil Justice | Class Actions | CLE | Congress | Damages | Discovery | Double Dipping | Employment Law | Fee Shifting | Good Samaritan Bill | Governor Christie | Governor Murphy | Insurance | Judicial Independence | Judicial Selection | Juries | Legal Reform | Medical & Pharmaceutical Liability | Medical Liability | New Jersey Bar Association | New Jersey Courts | New Jersey Legislature | New Jersey Supreme Court | NJCJI | Paid Sick Leave | Patent Law | Personal Jurisdiction | Pharmaceutical Litigation | Policy Teleforum | Regulation via Litigation | Rule of Law | Settlement Trust Transparency | Statute of Limitations | TCCWNA | Third Circuit | Tort Reform | Trial Lawyers | Wrongful Death

Newsletter Sign Up




© 2019 NJCJI. All rights reserved.

Follow us on:

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin

TWITTER FEED TWITTER FEED

  • RT @ROINJNews: As president and chief counsel at the @NJCivilJustice, Alida Kass is a strong supporter of any laws aimed at helpin… https://t.co/1NPn5cGaQh, Jan 24
  • RT @ROINJNews: Under legislation blasted by @AmTortReform, @NJCivilJustice president says legitimate market-based decisions bring… https://t.co/C8XhNC6SgQ, Jan 23
  • Burger King update! https://t.co/aDgTzy61dZ, Jan 17
  • Assembly Law & Public Safety Meeting discussing civil asset forfeiture. Defenders of practice emphasizing no profit… https://t.co/XotcLOox0C, Jan 17
  • Interesting read! https://t.co/PtA0yJolyo, Jan 14

QUICK CONTACT



Please enter the code as shown below

captcha

New Jersey Civil Justice Institute | 112 West State Street, Trenton, NJ 08608 | office: (609) 392-6557 | info@civiljusticenj.org