Fairness. Justice.
Rule of Law.
NEWSROOM
Top News Clips for the Week of November 26 – December 2
December 2, 2016A selection of the need-to-know civil justice news for the week of November 26 – December 2.
Read More »Which Lawsuit Will Be Named New Jersey’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit of 2016?
December 2, 2016Get ready to cast your vote! The polls are now open for the New Jersey Civil Justice Institute’s annual Most Ludicrous Lawsuit competition. A lot of ridiculous lawsuits were filed in New Jersey this year, but only one can be crowned 2016’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit. “These lawsuits exist because our legal system is fundamentally More »
Read More »2016’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit Dishonorable Mentions
December 2, 2016Not every ridiculous lawsuit filed in the Garden State can make it into the upper echelon of absurdity, so this year we are awarding Dishonorable Mentions to a handful of suits that didn’t quite make the cut, but still leave us scratching our heads in disbelief.
Read More »Cast Your Vote for 2016’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit
December 2, 2016A lot of ridiculous lawsuits were filed in New Jersey this year, but only one can be crowned 2016’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit. Cast your vote now for this year’s “winner.”
Read More »Top News Clips for the Week of November 19-25
November 25, 2016A selection of the need-to-know civil justice news for the week of November 19-25.
Read More »Top News Clips for the Week of November 12-18
November 18, 2016A selection of the need-to-know civil justice news for the week of November 12-18.
Read More »Top News Clips for the Week of November 5 – 11
November 11, 2016A selection of the need-to-know civil justice news for the week of November 5 – 11.
Read More »Top News Clips for the Week of October 29-November 4
November 4, 2016A selection of the need-to-know civil justice news for the week of October 29-November 4.
Read More »It’s Not That Courts Can’t Do It, It’s That They Shouldn’t Have To
November 4, 2016In a recent issue of the New Jersey Law Journal, the Editorial Board hailed the work of the U.S. District Court judge in California that quickly disposed of the headline-generating case over the amount of ice Starbucks puts in its iced coffees. Wonderful. As the Board notes, the case “comes dangerously close to warranting Rule 11 sanctions.”
Read More »