New Jersey
Civil Justice Institute

  • Helpful Links
  • Contact Us
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Mission
    • Membership
    • Our Staff
  • ISSUES & ADVOCACY
  • OUR WORK IN THE COURTS
  • NEWSROOM
  • GET INVOLVED

Fairness. Justice.
Rule of Law.

Tag Archives: New Jersey Courts

Which Lawsuit Will Be Named New Jersey’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit of 2017?

December 12, 2017News, Top StoriesNew Jersey Courts, Outrageous LawsuitsNJCJI

2017's Most Ludicrous LawsuitGet ready to cast your vote! The polls are now open for the New Jersey Civil Justice Institute’s annual Most Ludicrous Lawsuit competition. A lot of ridiculous lawsuits were filed in New Jersey this year, but only one can be crowned 2017’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit.

 

“Our state’s judges shouldn’t have to waste time dealing with lawsuits that don’t pass the laugh test. But they do. All the time,” said NJCJI president and chief counsel Alida Kass. “Many laughable lawsuits are filed because New Jersey law incentivizes them. When the law encourages a disregard for personal responsibility, or allows uninjured parties and their attorneys to collect a windfall, people are going to take advantage of it.”

 

“We cannot and should not shut the courthouse doors on such claims because we don’t want to prevent people with legitimate grievances from seeking justice, but we can discourage nefarious filers by making some common-sense reforms to our legal system and empowering our judges to make quick work of silly suits,” added Kass.

 

Cast your vote for 2017’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit on the NJCJI website before the poll closes on December 28! Then sign up to get our newsletter, where we will announce the winner on December 29.

 

2017’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit Dishonorable Mentions

December 8, 2017News, Top StoriesNew Jersey Courts, Outrageous LawsuitsNJCJI

2017's Most Ludicrous LawsuitNot every ridiculous lawsuit filed in the Garden State can make it into the upper echelon of absurdity, so this year we are awarding Dishonorable Mentions to a handful of suits that didn’t quite make the cut, but still leave us scratching our heads in disbelief.

 

Subway Footlong Saga

The Subway footlong lawsuit, which was filed in 2013, came to its inglorious ending this year. The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals threw out the “utterly worthless” settlement agreement, which would have given $5,000 to each of the 10 named plaintiffs and $520,000 to the lawyers involved.

 

“A class action that seeks only worthless benefits for the class and yields only fees for class counsel is no better than a racket and should be dismissed out of hand,” Circuit Judge Diane Sykes wrote for a three-judge panel. “That’s an apt description of this case.”

 

The lawyers at DeNittis Osefchen Prince P.C. in Evesham, who filed the first footlong lawsuit, are reportedly not happy with the court’s decision. In a Courier-Post article, attorney Stephen DeNittis disputes claims that the settlement was “a windfall for the attorneys at the expense of the class” He said, “Such was clearly not the case. There were 10 law firms involved in the 3 1/2-year-long action who devoted well over 2,000 hours in time in litigating the matter.”

 

Unfortunately for them, work put into a worthless project doesn’t turn a sow’s ear into a silk purse.

 

“Blame it on the a a a a a alcohol.”

It seems like every year there is a ridiculous case filed by someone who wants to blame their drunken mistakes on anyone but themselves. This year, a young Bergen County man sued Endicott College and its president under Massachusetts’s social host liability law. He blames them for not stopping him from getting drunk and assaulting three of his now-former classmates. He is seeking damages for the loss to his reputation and for pain and suffering.

 

The Litigious Lawmaker

As the old saying goes, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me may result in a lawsuit.” Well, that’s how one South Jersey politician thought it should go. Former Democratic Councilman Dennis Kleiner of Galloway filed suit against the municipality, the mayor, and another councilman after he resigned his position, claiming rumors and false charges forced him out of office. A Superior Court judge called his “hurt feelings” lawsuit “pointless,” and threw out the complaint, and this year the Appellate Division affirmed that decision.

 

Phoney Lawsuits

Jan Konopca has collected over $80,000 by filing Telephone Consumer Protection Act lawsuits against companies that call the many phones he keeps on hand. The law is designed to cut down on unwanted calls, but Konopca seems to relish these communications, which have become quite lucrative for him. His latest suit, which is pending before a federal judge New Jersey, recently survived a motion to dismiss despite the fact that the judge determined “it is most probable that [Konopca] manufactured the harm based on his motivation to be awarded monetary awards in the lawsuits.”

 

Bovine Boogeyman

A farmer in Warren county has sued the county fair on behalf of her livestock, who get spooked when hot air balloons fly over her farm. She claims complaints she made in previous years when unanswered, so she had to take the matter to court.

 

The actual nominees for 2017’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit are even more ridiculous. Click here to check out this year’s nominees and cast your vote for which one should be crowned 2017’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit.

 

Cast Your Vote for 2017’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit

December 8, 2017News, Top StoriesNew Jersey Courts, Outrageous LawsuitsNJCJI

2017's Most Ludicrous LawsuitA lot of ridiculous lawsuits were filed in New Jersey this year, but only one can be crowned 2017’s Most Ludicrous Lawsuit. Cast your vote now for this year’s “winner.”

 

This year’s nominees are:

 

Mousecapade

A woman in Hackensack filed a lawsuit against Home Depot after being assaulted by a mouse in one of its stores. She was hospitalized, and claims she “now grab[s] her neck because she feels there is something there, and she suffers nightmares that a mouse might be endangering her life.” And she “looks for mice on her plate when eating.’’

 

Unending Accutane Epic

Over 2,000 lawsuits alleging the acne medication Accutane causes intestinal issues have been pending in the New Jersey courts for years despite the fact that there is no scientific evidence supporting such claims. This year, the New Jersey Supreme Court used one of these cases to expand the amount of time out-of-state plaintiffs have to file suit. In another, the Appellate Division laid bare the deficiencies of New Jersey’s unique rules governing the admissibility of expert testimony. We may not be “the nation’s medicine chest” for long if these are the kinds of rulings we continue to see.

 

Drink Price Dilemma

For the past few years, scores of businesses have been sued under New Jersey’s Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty, and Notice Act (TCCWNA). This year, a case alleging missing drink prices on menus is a TCCWNA violation made it all the way to the New Jersey Supreme Court. The attorneys involved claimed the suit was worth billions, yes billions, with a b. Thankfully, the Court disagreed, and put the brakes on the runaway train of TCCWNA litigation.

 

Fa-la-la-la-la la-la-la Lawsuit

A man in New Milford sued the owners of an apartment building after he tripped on a Christmas tree that was “recklessly, carelessly and/or negligently” discarded on its premises. He claims the experience has caused him “great pain and torment, both mental and physical.”

 

Check the Box Chicanery

The Appellate Division’s decision to throw out an otherwise valid arbitration agreement over the check-the-box process the company used to roll out its new policy highlights just how low the New Jersey courts are willing to stoop to strike a blow against arbitration. If other contracts were treated like this, we would have a contract-formation crisis on our hands.

 

 

Create your own user feedback survey

Top News Clips for November 11-17

November 17, 2017News, Recent NewsNew Jersey Courts, Outrageous LawsuitsNJCJI

A selection of the need-to-know civil justice news for November 11-17. Continue reading →

No Place Like Home: Corporate Jurisdiction & the Future of Forum Shopping

December 1, 2017News, Top StoriesBusiness Climate, New Jersey Courts, Personal Jurisdiction, SCOTUSNJCJI

The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California, shuts down certain forms of forum shopping, but it might lead to more lawsuits being filed in New Jersey state courts because of our state’s plaintiff-friendly laws and the fact that many major businesses call New Jersey home. On October 20, 2017, the New Jersey Civil Justice Institute hosted a conference exploring this issue.

 

The featured panel was moderated by Shalom Stone of Stone Conroy LLC. It included remarks by Sean Marotta of Hogan Lovell, John K. Kim of Johnson & Johnson, Theodore H. Frank of CEI’s Center for Class Action Fairness, and Eric Jaso of Spiro Harrison.

 

 

If you would like to become a member of the New Jersey Civil Justice Institute, and attend future events in person, please contact us.

 

New Jersey Supreme Court Looking for Rulemaking Committee Members

December 1, 2017News, Top StoriesNew Jersey Courts, New Jersey Supreme CourtNJCJI

The New Jersey Court System has over 40 committees that help it develop and implement new policies through the court’s rulemaking process. Right now, the court is looking for volunteers to serve on seven committees for the 2018-2020 term.

 

1. Arbitration Advisory Committee

2. Civil Practice Committee

3. Committee on Jury Selection in Civil and Criminal Trials

4. Committee on Model Civil Jury Charges

5. Special Civil Part Practice Committee

6. Committee on the Tax Court

7. Committee on Women in the Courts

 

These committees strive to be as inclusive and collaborative as possible, but in the grand scheme of things, the people who are going to have a say in what the court’s committees do, are the people that volunteer to serve on them.

 

Any attorney interested in being considered by the Court for possible appointment, either to any of these specific committees or generally, can submit an application at the following site: http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/sccms/onlinemembership/

 

NJCJI strongly encourages our members and supporters to apply for appointment to any committee they are interested in serving on.

 

New Jersey High Court Ponders Liability in the New Economy

October 27, 2017News, Top StoriesEmployment Law, New Jersey Courts, New Jersey Supreme CourtNJCJI

Amicus brief in Vitale v. Schering-PloughContract work blurs the traditional definitions and roles of employee and employer, and this evolution of the labor market has created tension between contract law and employment law. The New Jersey Supreme Court has taken up a case that arises out of that evolution. It is deciding whether contract employees can be required to waive tort claims they might bring against a contract employer when Workers Compensation is available from their direct employer. We filed an amicus brief in this case arguing that making the Workers’ Comp model compatible with the modern economy requires that such arrangements be upheld. Continue reading →

Top News Clips for September 23-29

September 29, 2017News, Recent NewsExpert Evidence, New Jersey Courts, Outrageous LawsuitsNJCJI

A selection of the need-to-know civil justice news for September 23-29. Continue reading →

Top News Clips for August 26-September 1

September 1, 2017News, Recent NewsClass Actions, Expert Evidence, New Jersey Courts, New Jersey Supreme Court, Outrageous LawsuitsNJCJI

A selection of the need-to-know civil justice news for August 26-September 1. Continue reading →

High Court Bursts TCCWNA Bubble

October 13, 2017News, Top StoriesClass Actions, New Jersey Courts, New Jersey Supreme Court, TCCWNA, Third CircuitNJCJI

Dugan Bozzi OpinionThe New Jersey Supreme Court has finally brought some clarity and sanity to the Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty, and Notice Act (TCCWNA). Continue reading →

Posts navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Newsletter Sign Up




© 2022 NJCJI. All rights reserved.

Follow us on:

  • twitter
  • linkedin

TWITTER FEED TWITTER FEED

  • NJCJI thanks Jeff Jacobson and his team at Faegre Drinker for their exceptional advocacy on this critical independe… https://t.co/EWGTopWwxK, Aug 5
  • This week, NJCJI was on the prevailing side in a critical arbitration case decided by the NJ Supreme Court: https://t.co/6rDBr7kOH4, Jul 22
  • NJCJI President Anthony Anastasio Quoted in New Jersey Law Journal on Third-Party Litigation Funding https://t.co/8SvaF5GJuF, Jul 15
  • https://t.co/DlWbCRFBea, Jul 1
  • https://t.co/xl0stnCZfj NJCJI President Anthony Anastasio testified this week about the implications of NJ Senate… https://t.co/o55d5pA29b, Jun 24

    QUICK CONTACT



    Please enter the code as shown below

    captcha

    New Jersey Civil Justice Institute | 112 West State Street, Trenton, NJ 08608 | office: (609) 218-6331 | info@civiljusticenj.org